Updated July 18th, 2026
Breaking: The Fight Is Not Over
NOW:
Attend the DES Public Hearing at Wando High School 6pm Wednesday, July 22nd.
Dear neighbors,
On Tuesday night, Mount Pleasant Town Council voted 5–4 against withholding municipal consent for Charleston County's current Highway 41 plan.
We are deeply disappointed by the outcome. But Tuesday's vote did not approve the project, issue its environmental permits, or end the public's opportunity to demand a better solution. In short, the fight is not over.
One avenue may have closed Tuesday night, but the next phase is already underway.
A Quick State of Play for the Current Highway 41 Fight
Despite the Mount Pleasant vote, the Highway 41 project is not a done deal. Major state and federal permits remain pending.
The next public hearing begins at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, July 22, at the Wando High School Auditorium (1000 Warrior Way, Mount Pleasant, SC 29466).
Written comments remain open through August 1, and Smart Growth 41 has created a form to help residents submit them through our Action Center.
What happened Tuesday night
First, we want to thank every resident who showed up, spoke, submitted one of the more than 700 comments Town Council received, and encouraged neighbors to get involved.
Hundreds of residents packed Mount Pleasant Town Hall. The Council chambers filled beyond capacity, an overflow room had to be opened, and residents provided nearly two and a half hours of public comment. Councilmembers and longtime meeting attendees remarked that they had never seen public participation on that scale.
That turnout mattered.
We may not have won the vote, but the community delivered an unmistakable message: opposition to the County's current Highway 41 design is broad, organized, informed, and not going away. Residents will continue to speak up, demand accountability, and fight for a better solution.
We are grateful to Councilmembers Daniel Brownstein, John Iacofano, Laura Hyatt, and Jake Rambo, who voted to withhold municipal consent and push Charleston County toward a better Highway 41 plan.
We are deeply disappointed that Mayor Will Haynie and Councilmembers Mike Tinkey, Kathryn Whitaker, and Alex Crosby did not keep the promises they made to residents to oppose a road through Laurel Hill County Park. We are also disappointed that Councilmember Howard Chapman voted once again to advance this failed plan.
Residents will remember this vote. More importantly, the elected officials who supported the County's plan should understand that Tuesday night did not end the public debate, nor did it resolve the underlying environmental, flooding, drainage, and community concerns.
Tuesday's vote was never the project's final hurdle
From the beginning, there have been two broad avenues through which the Highway 41 design could be reconsidered: the political process and the permitting process.
The municipal consent vote was an important opportunity to bring Charleston County back to the table, but it was never the project's only remaining hurdle or Smart Growth 41's only path forward.
For six years, we have also worked through the state and federal permitting processes, building a detailed public record and identifying the environmental and technical flaws that agencies must consider before this project can lawfully proceed.
That work now returns to the forefront.
Despite claims that the project will imminently move forward, the principal permits needed to build it have not been issued. The South Carolina Department of Environmental Services is still considering state approvals, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has not issued the federal Section 404 permit required for impacts to federally protected wetlands and waters.
No final decision has been made on those central approvals.
The project still must withstand serious review involving wetlands, flooding, drainage, water quality, construction runoff, coastal resources, historic resources, alternatives, and the broader public interest.
The next opportunity: The July 22 DES hearing
The South Carolina Department of Environmental Services (DES) will hold its next Highway 41 public meeting and hearing:
Wednesday, July 22, 2026
6:00 p.m.
Wando High School Auditorium
1000 Warrior Way
Mount Pleasant, SC 29466
Please attend if you can.
This hearing is different from earlier proceedings residents may have attended. It focuses primarily on Charleston County's application for a construction stormwater permit and the associated coastal review.
In plain language, DES is being asked whether the County has developed an adequate plan to control erosion, sediment, flooding risks, and other pollution during the years of major construction it will take to build the Laurel Hill Parkway and widen Highway 41.
Runoff from the project would flow toward sensitive creeks, wetlands, shellfish-harvesting waters, and other coastal resources. These are direct questions about whether construction runoff and pollution could affect nearby neighborhoods, wetlands, creeks, and coastal resources.
This hearing is important, but it is not final approval of the entire Highway 41 project. It is also not an Army Corps hearing and it will not decide whether the County may fill federally protected wetlands. The Army Corps Section 404 review remains one of the project's most important outstanding approvals.
How to make your comments effective
Residents do not need to be engineers or environmental experts to participate.
The most useful comments connect your personal knowledge and local experience to the questions DES is reviewing, including:
- Flooding or drainage problems you have personally observed.
- Concerns about sediment, runoff, wetlands, creeks, or nearby water quality.
- Questions about whether construction controls will protect homes, neighborhoods, and natural resources during construction.
- Concerns about the scale of clearing, grading, road construction, and stormwater discharge.
- Concerns about who will inspect the project, maintain the controls, correct failures, and remain accountable throughout construction.
Comments tied to these permitting issues are generally more useful than simply restating opposition to the overall project.
Smart Growth 41 has created a pre-populated form that residents can review, personalize, and submit through our Action Center.
Written comments remain open through August 1, 2026.
Where we go from here
Tuesday night was deeply disappointing. Residents showed up in extraordinary numbers, made a compelling case, and asked their elected officials to stand by the commitments they had made and insist on a better plan.
Five members of Mount Pleasant Town Council chose not to do so.
But that vote is not the final say. It did not issue the project's permits. It did not resolve its environmental deficiencies. It did not erase the technical concerns residents have raised for years. And it did not end Smart Growth 41's work.
Where we go from here is clear.
We attend the July 22 hearing. We submit focused written comments. We continue demanding the technical information, enforceable protections, and public accountability this project requires. And we remain active through every state and federal review that stands between Charleston County's current design and construction.
Tuesday night proved the strength of this movement.
Now we carry that strength into the next phase.
Smart Growth 41
Smart Growth 41 is a coalition of Local Highway 41 citizens
working to advance the best transportation solution for the Highway 41 expansion in Charleston County.
Our Primary Concerns are with
Identifying The Best Travel Solution
The “Road to Compromise” proposal does not address traffic in the neighborhoods it plans to bisect. It also is a poor solution considering the estimated 18,000 home units being built in Berkley County which will use Highway 41.
Child & Pedestrian Safety
The “Road to Compromise” proposal poses a safety risk by routing highway traffic into neighborhood streets and posing a safety risk to pedestrians and cyclists.
Severe Environmental Loss
A massive area of forest and marshland will be lost forever if the “Road to Compromise” is built.
Cost to The Taxpayer
"The Road to Compromise" will cost $23 million more than what was originally budgeted for Highway 41 expansion. This shortfall will likely need to be covered by higher taxes or by redirecting funds from other County transportation projects.
The Facts
The “Road to Compromise” proposal would be $23 million more expensive than what was originally budgeted for this project, more adversely affect the surrounding environment, and fail to address the future growth needs of our region.
The Facts
The “Road to Compromise” proposal would be $23 million more expensive than what was originally budgeted for this project, more adversely affect the surrounding environment, and fail to address the future growth needs of our region.
For over five years Charleston County has been working to identify a solution to alleviate the current and worsening traffic problems on Highway 41. After an extensive study period it was determined that Alternative 1, widening the existing Highway 41 right-of-way, was the most practical and effective transportation solution to alleviate area traffic issues and accommodate future growth in the region. It would accomplish this goal at the lowest cost to the taxpayer and with the smallest environmental impact.
Along the way several misconceptions developed regarding the preferred Alternative 1 solution. Charleston County is now in the process of revisiting a modified version of the previously rejected Alternative 7 proposal to widen Highway 41. Colloquially known as the “Road to Compromise”, it would be $23 million more expensive than what was originally budgeted for this project, more adversely affect the surrounding environment, and fail to address the future growth needs of our region.
Smart Growth 41 was created to dispel this confusion surrounding the expansion of Highway 41 and to find the solution that would have the lowest cost and greatest benefit to Charleston County. At the start of this process several evaluation criteria were established to determine which proposed expansion of Highway 41 would best meet the project need. The leadership of Charleston County should lean on this scorecard and adopt a facts-based approach when determining their final design for this project.
Environmental Impact
Environmental Impact
The "Road to Compromise" will destroy a large section of park forest, disrupting wildlife permanently.
Hawks, Alligators, Turkey, Deer, Ducks, Cranes, Heron, Coyotes, Wild Cats, and more will lose their territory and very likely their ability to survive.
These photos were taken of wildlife living in the forest that would be impacted by the new highway
The below drone footage shows the area of Charleston county forest that will be destroyed for The "Road to compromise".
In fact, our drone range wasn't far enough to show the entire path of deforestation.
The map below shows the new Laurel Hill Parkway path through the
forest wetlands and skirting neighborhoods in Park West.
Child and Pedestrian Safety
Child & Pedestrian Safety
The “Road to Compomise” will route highway traffic through a congested pedestrian area with walkers, joggers, bicyclists, and young children that has previously experienced tragic accidents. Dramatically increasing the number of vehicles driving through this area will greatly increase the potential and probability for more accidents involving pedestrians.
School Children Hit by Cars
The proposed extension splits 2 neighborhoods, and will force families to regularly cross a four lane highway to access public schools, child care, parks, and amenities, causing a safety hazard.
In Park West alone, there have been 2 publicized accidents where children using the crosswalk have been hit by a vehicle, despite numerous safety measures such as a crossing guard and flashing warning lights.
“All of the cars had stopped on both sides and then when she started to go out, this truck just came around from nowhere and hit her,” said Rogge. “When the truck hit her, her whole body went flying over to that side in the air. She had a fractured skull and she had road rash all over her, she had stitches all up in her mouth, she was in the hospital for three days”
Increased Traffic Volume equals higher rates of pedestrian incidents
Rerouting existing highway traffic through more densely populated neighborhoods could increase the scale of traffic incidents involving pedestrians. Current traffic models estimate that 7,800 cars per day take a trip through these neighborhoods, but if the "Road to Compromise" is advanced, that is estimated to increase to 23,800 trips by 2040.
The "Road to Compromise" negatively impacts the safety of the 606 dwellings off of Dune West Boulevard, as well the 1782 dwellings in Park West (the two neighborhoods that would be most affected by this project). Bicyclists and young children have already been hit at crosswalks this year in the direct path of the new proposal as reported on the NextDoor app (April and June) [Click to read more] and that will likely increase if more traffic is routed through these neighborhoods.
Why Take The Risk?
Common Misconceptions
The #1 misconception is home displacement. No Homes would be displaced in the Alternative 1 plan.
Myth: The "Road to Compromise" is a new proposal to Highway 41.
Fact: The "Road to Compromise" is a slightly modified version of Alternative 7, a previously considering proposal to widen Highway 41. Alternative 7 was rejected due to the higher costs, more significant environmental impacts, and longer drive times associated with the plan as well as its failure to address the future growth needs of the region.
Myth: The previously approved Alternative 1 plan for Highway 41 has been revisited because of concerns that additional land would need to be acquired and homes would be taken in order to complete the project.
Fact: Existing right of way is sufficient to complete the Alternative 1 proposal for Highway 41 without any additional improvements provisioned for by the county. Only 15 feet of additional right of way on each side of the proposed corridor would be required in order to move forward with the previously approved and recommended plan to widen the existing Highway 41 Route. This additional right of way would not be used for travel lanes, but instead would be used to create a center turn lane requested by the communities located along the Highway 41 corridor as well as a landscaped sidewalk and recreational path.
Myth: The new “Road to Compromise” proposal for widening Highway 41 will not be any more expensive than what was previously budgeted for Highway 41 expansion.
Fact: The “Road to Compromise” will cost almost $30 million more than what was originally budgeted to expand Highway 41. To cover this shortfall some combination of additional tax revenues and budget cuts to other important programs and transportation initiatives will need to likely need to be enacted.
Myth: The "Road to Compromise" is the most environmentally sound solution to widen Highway 41.
Fact:
The rationale previously used for selecting Alternative 1 over Alternative 7 (a plan similar to the “Road to Compromise” that was previously rejected) was sound, thorough and compelling in virtually every measurable category of the NEPA (National Environmental Protection Act) analysis. Alternative 7 was inferior to Alternative 1 in almost every category defined in the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) process. The “Road to Compromise” does not seem to address or improve any of the well documented detrimental aspects of Alternative 7 including:
- A larger construction footprint
- The creation of a new major drainage system which will displace hundred of millions of gallons of road runoff into pristine rivers and marshes
- Major environmental disturbances to Laurel Hill County Park
- Increases in automobile pollution due to longer travel times for drivers
Myth: Highway 41 needs to be widened to account for additional traffic from Dunes West and Park West as there are still several thousand houses left to be built out in both communities.
Fact: Construction of new houses in Dunes West and Park West is nearly complete. There are less than 100 houses to be built out between the two communities. This lessens the feasibility of reducing Highway 41 from four to three lanes at the entrance to these communities, as the additional traffic traveling on Highway 41 will mostly be due to development in Berkeley County. The estimate for new homes leading from 41 in Berkley County is now 18,000 units.
Myth: There are already plans in place to widen Dunes West Boulevard within the next 5 years. The “Road to Compromise” proposal provides an opportunity to further leverage already planned infrastructure improvements
Fact:
The Town of Mount Pleasant, which has jurisdiction over Dunes West Boulevard has no immediate plans to expand the road. In fact, the widening of Dunes West Boulevard is not even included in the Town of Mount Pleasant’s long term capital improvement plan. Widening the road as future improvement as part of the “Road to Compromise” would be an additional logistical and fiscal factor that would need to be taken under consideration.
Ask Your Reps for a Safer, Cost Effective, Environmentally Concious, & Efficient Transportation Solution
Win-Wins for All Communities
Workable solutions have been discussed by neighborhood leaders from a variety of communities along Highway 41. These solutions avoid encroachment into neighborhoods, enhance historic preservation & awareness, avoid devastating environmental destruction, increase pedestrian safety, and address future high volume travel coming from Berkeley County. Click here to read about one such proposal and dialogue.
Additional Resources
Representative Landing's Response Here
Read The County's Response to DES
Read The County's Response to the USACE
Read Responses from the 2023 Town of Mount Pleasant Candidate Survey on Highway 41
Park West Community Official HWY 41 Survey
Highway 41 County Council "road to compromise" Powerpoint Download
Read Responses from the 2021 Candidates for Town of Mount Pleasant Council on The Subject
Our contact form is sent to local leaders:
Charleston County Hwy 41 Project Team: hwy41sc@gmail.com 843-972-4403
Charleston County Councilmen
District 1 Herb Sass: hsass@charlestoncounty.org 843-693-8305
District 2 Larry Kobrovsky LKobrovsky@CharlestonCounty.org (843) 955-8143
District 3 Robert L. Wehrman 843)958-4030 (O) rlwehrman@charlestoncounty.org
District 4 Henry E. Darby (843)901-6793 (C) henrydarby@msn.com
District 5 Teddie E. Pryor, Sr. (843)958-4030 (O) tpryor@charlestoncounty.org
District 6 Kylon Jerome Middleton (843)325-4577 (C) kmiddleton@charlestoncounty.org
District 7 C. Brantley Moody (843)270-2483 (C) bmoody@charlestoncounty.org
District 8 Joe Boykin JBoykin@CharlestonCounty.org (843) 214-0337
District 9 Jenny Costa Honeycutt 843 -693-6447 jhoneycutt@charlestoncounty.org
Town of Mount Pleasant Council
Mayor Will Haynie bashe@tompsc.com (843) 884-8517
Howard R. Chapman, P.E. councilclk@tompsc.com
Brenda Corley councilclk@tompsc.com
John Iacofano councilclk@tompsc.com
Carl Ritchie councilclk@tompsc.com
Laura Hyatt councilclk@tompsc.com
Jake Rambo councilclk@tompsc.com
Gary Santos councilclk@tompsc.com
Guang Ming Whitley councilclk@tompsc.com
Senator Larry Grooms: LarryGrooms@scsenate.gov
State Representative Mark Smith – MarkSmith@schouse.gov
State Representative Kathy Landing: KathyLanding@SCHouse.gov (803) 212-6975
State Representative District 112 Charleston County Joe Bustos: JoeBustos@schouse.gov